I don’t understand Tamron’s recent push of L and E mount lenses. One stop is one stop. Its very reasonably priced. The minimum focus distance is 19cm (7.5") and the maximum magnification is 0.21x. There are so many different types of lenses they could be adding to the pool, instead it just seems to be redundancy. Clips and Fasteners carries heater bypass caps, assorted car rod clips and more, letting you address the small issues that can stall repairs. Because the extra size and bulk of FF is not worth what you get out of it for everyone. Uneducated guess is the mount protocol of X-mount is close guarded secret of Fujifilm. The average consumer does not buy those lenses. Arthur P. Tugade, DTI Sec. Warning 1: Image sharpness depends more on you than your lens. Tamron Announces World’s First [1] 17-70mm F2.8 Wide Range 4.1x Standard Zoom Lens with VC For APS-C Mirrorless Cameras. @MikeRan That's not even that point of what I'm saying. There is Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS that cost more ($1000) and has 8 perceptual megapixel of sharpness. XF27mmF2.8 (41mm equiv.) And I would love a unicorn, but we get what we can get. You know it’s not a fair comparison to compare resolution of a 2.8L lens at f4.0 with an f4L lens at f4. Plenty of people would rather pay $2500 for an APS-C A9 than $4.5K especially since the A9 is highly pixel challenged when FL limited. Looks like the maximum reproduction ratio is pretty close between the two, with the focal length difference, though. One of those lenses is the XF 27mm f/2.8 R WR pancake lens, an update to the current 27mm. I also would love a 9 or 10mm f/2.8 for APS-C. Manual focus is ok. What are you talking about? And most aren't professionals. Pricing is too odd. None of those goes up to 70mm. The focus unit is driving by a 'Rapid eXtra-silent stepping drive' (RXD) stepper motor. Flare and Ghosts     performance      top. This is the Standard Zoom for all NEX-6/7 and A6x00 Bodies, that never was being avialable since the original NEX-6/7, it does feature 20mm more Reach at the Teleend, and it does have built-into VC, means Vibration Compensation, Image Stablizer. And PRO - photo market is one of the biggest jokes ever existed with photo profession falling flat just like the whole industry.So I really do not see what is the sense/logic of making more and more expensive products that will be sold out to smaller and smaller groups of people?!?! I’m not saying it’s a bad deal or a bad lens, I’m saying that an aps-c camera owner may not want to spent that kind of money to obsolete a lens they already own. But any day of the week 135 format sensor is much more expensive to produce!!! Apparently we are allowed to suggest one stop on a lens is a reasonable argument to make but one stop on the sensor is a BS argument. Results will be very similar to a 24-105/4.0 on full frame. The photographer can still use their 43mm filter under this hood. unlike the “first party” lens from Sony for the APS-C e mount. The 70-350 is 900, and the 16-55 is 1300. After landing on Mars on February 18, Perseverance has been busy. You do have to move a switch on your camera to go between auto and manual focus. The Model V also comes with a plastic dust cap and an adjustment tool. I don't know why you are yelling at me, or at DPR for pasting text from a press release from Tamron USA. 102mm long without the lens hood; ... Sony E, Nikon Z and Fuji X mounts. Fujifilm Fujinon XF 27mm F2.8 Lens (Black) - Like New Condition! Fujinon XF16mmF2.8 R WR Lens - Black. Noise levels itself is somewhere around 1.3 stops of improvement. Is it so hard to speak language that most of the world understands DPReview? Stacking an APS-C size sensor will still be quite expensive and will put that APS-C camera likely in line with an A7III. In the case of the f/2.8 vs f/4 lenses, it's one stop *and* better optics. You really should get a unit conversion app on your phone. Damn, of course they had to release it two months after I bought Sony's own 16-55mm 2.8!One thing to note, the Sony lens is ever so slightly smaller and lighter, but also has a shorter minimum focusing distance. That's another thing; the Sony has a very minimal amount of focus breathing, and is also fairly close to being parfocal. It's interesting though, it seems to depend on where you live. A Sony A6600 with this lens would be cheaper and have more zoom. Beating the 16-70 in sharpness should be pretty easy. So if you really need to be future proof better go MF or LF. Keep clicking on this hoping it turns into an FE lens. And that also brings the benefit of being lightweight. I'm mostly into M43 these days but I do still have an a6000 laying around that could use a fast travel lens. Ramon M. Lopez, PCOO Sec. @BacktoNature1- I dont think this is a super relevant question- the average person is NOT buying constant aperture lenses- the average person is buying smartphone cameras and feeling fine with the images they shoot. Find out here. © 2014 KenRockwell.com. 5.0 out of 5 stars 1. The point that you are missing is that you get 95-99% of the image quality, those last few percent that stands out with a full-frame system will cost you an insane amount of money. At 41mm equivalent, this funny-sounding 27mm lens is actually the one normal lens you might need for everything. Hands-on with Fujifilm's new XF 27mm, XF 70-300 and GF 80mm lenses Feb 1, 2021 DPReview TV: Fujifilm X-E4 first impressions review ... 27: X100V Square Hood Options: 21: which way to go from the XE2: 14: Is a hot/stuck pixel common on Fujifilm cameras? And on 17-70mm, that corresponds almost exactly to 26-107mm, no decimals needed. Sigma announces 28-70mm F2.8 DG DN Contemporary for L and E mounts, NASA shares Perseverance's first 360° view of Mars, Rode's new Wireless Go II system now offers dual channel recording, onboard storage and more, A closer look at Sony's FX3 'compact cinematography' camera, Sony adds compact full-frame FX3 to Cinema Line, Interview: Sony's Masaaki Oshima - "The Alpha 1 is the first step towards the next decade", Sony Nordic reveals the a7S III is getting S-Cinetone color profile with its 2.00 firmware update, Huawei announces foldable Mate X2 smartphone with Leica-branded cameras, Venus Optics launches Laowa 11mm F4.5 lens for Canon RF mount, 65mm F2.8 2X Macro lens for Nikon Z mount, Interview: Scott Bourne on new Olympus 150-400mm PRO lens - 'when I first heard about it, it blew my mind', We've updated our gallery of samples from the new Sony a1, Video: Hasselblad discusses its design philosophy for the X System, Update: NASA's ambitious Perseverance rover lands on Mars and sends back its first images, Avalanche can now convert Aperture, Lightroom catalogs for use with Luminar AI, Hands-on with Panasonic's new 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 for L-mount, Slideshow: Winners of the 2021 Portraits of Humanity competition, Film Fridays: battle of two Medium Format titans - Mamiya 7 vs. Makina 67, Is something going on with Google Pixel cameras? Thanks for your support! This feature is available when the lens is used with cameras with or without in-body image stabilization. I'll also add the marginal cost of the two is different. :D. PAntunes This is a fast general purpose zooms, probably something most camera owners already have in the form of a super zoom that goes from 18-135 or so with an aperture of 3.5-5.6. These X100 cameras have an even faster fixed lens in a package that's even smaller than an interchangeable-lens X-mount camera, and the X100 series has a much better combined optical/electronic finder superior to anything else from Fuji. Hasselblad has launched a new video series, 'Hasselblad's Home,' offering a behind-the-scenes look at Hasselblad's headquarters and its products. SONY 10-18 no longer needed, as TAMRON has got a 12-24 APS-C in pipeline. This might be a design Sony rejected during the 16-55G process. You totally can use APSC for astrophotography but usually i wouldn't. Right? Unfortunately there is no avoiding physics in the real world. But is seems like many advocates for "the ultimate photo only IQ products" do not want to move to MF and LF. I doubt such a difference is real. But I would rather invest that $800 elsewhere. All formats are getting more and more expensive after each release. Laowa has expended the mirrorless camera mount options for two of its most popular manual primes: the Laowa 11mm F4.5 FF RL and the Laowa 65mm F2.8 2x Ultra-Macro APO. $1000, or so. Its a lot bigger and heavier. The Fujifilm XF 18mm f/2 has no image stabilization and neither does my Fuji X-T3. You have to move a switch on your camera to get to or from manual focus mode, and move a dial on the camera to change the aperture. Keep an eye out for @ gregcromie review of this coming soon. PRO market is dead end!And APSC is perfect for mass customer - good performance and good AF and much better price. A full-frame 20-70 f/4 would be perfect. Fujifilm XF 27mm f/2.8. Support open mount systems if you want third parties. December 2, 2020, Commack, NY – Tamron announces the launch of the 17-70mm F/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD (Model B070), a high-speed standard zoom lens for Sony E-mount APS-C mirrorless cameras on January 14, 2021 at approximately $799. We take a look beyond the specs to see what it offers to filmmakers. The 16-70 is not that bad in sharpness in the center. Compatible with all Fuji x100 cameras including the new x100V. Does anybody know whether the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 can be focused when not connected to a Sony E-mount body? It covers an equivalent angle of view as a 40mm lens on a full-frame sensor. Congratulations! If you need to go faster 1 stop!!! One stop is one stop. The lens features Moisture-Resistant Construction, Fluorine Coating and a Ø67mm filter size – the same as the Tamron series of lenses for full-frame mirrorless cameras. Please always use these links when getting any of your gear so I can continue to share what I know; it's what supports me. Second, the Sigma 100-400mm f/5-6.3 DG DN OS Contemporary Lens for Sony E has it for a total of $949. Our selection of car small parts covers just about every small plastic and rubber piece imaginable, from window cranks to radiator clips. The Model B070 has a focal length range of 17-70mm, equivalent to 25.5-105mm on full-frame cameras. Home  Donate  New  Search  Gallery  Reviews  How-To  Books  Links  Workshops  About  Contact. This is more of an example of what consumer will choose(Value) as opposed apples to apples lens comparison. And most aren't professionals.". Some people will use any means they like including disingenuous means to bash a company they don’t like. Does any one have a JJC square lens hood on their X100F?. Chris has the answers. IQ is VERY high in almost all formats today. Most gear heads at least have a gear list to show the great gear they have. From a Fujifilm user's perspective this $600-only Nikon 50mm/f1.8 would be equivalent to a 35mm/f1.2 lens; how much would that Fuji lens be? On a full frame you could be paying up to $2400 for the same upgrade. Specifications, appearance, functionality, etc. *excluding caps and hoods Filter size: ø39mm Read more. How many lenses did Sony expect to people to buy at that and higher prices? I get it, but the cost isn't $1,700 for someone already invested into a system. The encoder ring is slow and silly. You don't need a full-frame to get the shot. The Laowa 9 has garbage corner quality and the Rokinon 10mm f/2.8 is too big. However, if you want to get this lens to turn your Fuji X-mount camera into a tiny pocket camera, get an X100T (or old X100S or X100) instead of this lens. :), Honestly, and I loved my 6300, I want the aps sensor size to die off so we get a wider variety of lenses - this is just another redundant focal length zoom supporting a niche camera format at this point. 500€. The A9II or A7RIV would give you a different kind of experience, but now the difference in cost is just silly. then situation is + 1000$ for OEM lens + more weight!So 1 stop more with 135 format is around 1500$ more and + 1kg! El Toreador, 10 September 2014. The 70-180 is not stabilized. Autofocus is super-fast and always accurate. Tamron's lenses these days LOOK so damn good! However most Sony full frame bodies have ibis so Tamron saved money and weight omitting VC. I guess Canon have lost interest in the M models ,why produce an M6 with no built in EVF? Click through to read our in-depth interview. @Mike That one stop can be critical or it can be a non-issue. I by the way just bought a Nikon Z5 with the 24-200 as potential travel camera, and with the large beautiful viewfinder and ergonomic controls it makes shooting more fun. No way anyone would use a $3500 A7s3 in crop mode to shoot 5MP photos or 1080P video. Now they release an APS-C one, and you complain that there are not enough variety in Full Frame lenses? Some of this sounds like equivalence taken too far. 17 - 70mm on APS-C is equivalent to 25.5 - 105mm on FF. That's why we have Viltrox and Tokina AF prime lenses for the X mount. I don't think you can beat a X-E3 + 27mm f2.8 or Canon M200 + 22mm f2 or even Sony A5100 + 20mm f1.8. I wish I could use it on my A7s3, or there was a professional aps-c body to take advantage on this lens. Weight 18.5 oz?? >how many people with an A6X00 Camera will spring for an $800 lens? This is a fantastic choice. The hood is a total of 18mm in length, … Whether you make a living out of taking professional portraits, or are the weekend warrior who knows their way around flashes and reflectors, you'll want a camera with high resolution, exceptional autofocus and a good selection of portrait prime lenses. This is the square hood from squarehood.se for the X70 and X100 which is a plastic hood available to purchase online. No apology needed. I will say that comparing an f/2.8 zoom to an f/4 zoom is a bit of a red herring, as you are usually paying for the better optics on the f/2.8 lens (in addition to the wider aperture). The price would not bother me at all. If performance is good and they released it for Fujifilm cameras then I'd buy this, even if it meant selling other stuff. I hope they release a version for Canon M mount. Tamron announces 17-70mm F2.8 for Sony APS-C cameras, Tamron 17-70 F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD results on Amazon.com, Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 Di III RXD for Sony Mirrorless Full Frame/APS-C E Mount (Tamron 6 Year Limited USA Warranty), Black (AFA046S700), Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 for Sony Mirrorless Full Frame E Mount (Tamron 6 Year Limited USA Warranty), Tamron AF 28-75mm f/2.8 SP XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) with Built-In AF Motor for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras (Model A09NII), https://www.dpreview.com/products/sigma/lenses/sigma_18-35_1p8, https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1022903-REG/samsung_16_50mm_f_2_2_8_s_ed.html, https://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Sony/Zeiss-Carl-Zeiss-Vario-Tessar-T-STAR-E-16-70mm-F4-ZA-OSS-Sony-E-mounted-on-Sony-A6000__942, https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/products/ci/17912/N/4196380428?filters=fct_fixed-focal-lengths_2207%3A35mm%2Cfct_lens-format-coverage_3332%3Afull-frame-lenses%2Cfct_lens-mount_3442%3Asony-e-mount%2Cfct_lenses-kits_7315%3Alenses-only, https://geizhals.de/tamron-17-70mm-2-8-di-iii-a-vc-rxd-fuer-sony-e-b070s-a2438816.html, Tamron 17-70 F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD field review, Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD sample gallery, DPReview TV: Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 lens review, Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 sample gallery (DPReview TV), Sigma 28-70mm F2.8 DG DN sample gallery (DPReview TV), Panasonic S 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 Macro OIS sample gallery (DPReview TV), Panasonic S 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 Macro OIS sample gallery. There is a zoom lock switch to prevent the barrel from accidentally extended.". Hello, DPR! I'm glad you are happy with your camera havanna60, but I agree with the original poster. Its pretty much the cheapest Tele lens for Sony by far. The image quality I'm getting is borderline unacceptable at high iso values. Click through to see how they got on. Compatible with all Fuji x100 cameras including the new x100V. Ghost, 11:43 AM, 27 August 2014. What’s the closest one? Fujifilm X Series X-T200 Mirrorless Camera with XC 15-45mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS PZ Lens Dark Silver $499.99, Fujifilm X Series X-T30 Mirrorless Camera with 15-45mm Lens Silver $899.99, Fujifilm X Series X-T3 Mirrorless Camera with XF18-55mm F2.8-4 R LM OIS Lens Silver $1,399.99. Likely to be my first new lens in 2021. Although I’m aware the primes are very well regarded. Like a 14-60 would have been just perfect with a 58mm filter. Although, i've read about 900 bucks, so it's expensive, think Tamron 17-50/2.8 (non VC), a very good DSLR Zoom, which could keep up with the Nikon DX 17-55/2.8 into Terms of IQ, but not from build Quality, into the Heyday. This hood can also be used with a filter, with the help of the adapter ring. But which does he prefer? Just like why would you expect a site hosted and run by people in Seattle to not use American/Imperial units? I tend to buy some of my gear from Germany just because of that price difference sometimes. Check out our sample gallery and judge image quality for yourself. Due to the current global health crisis, the release date or product supply schedule could change. Really like the size of it, and the style of hood which is similar to the XF16mm and XF23mm style hood which I prefer over the Haoge style after market hoods for the X100. (Perfect match for 28-200 or 70-300). This is as close as it gets: Omega Constellation at close-focus distance. They are gonna use that lens at 2.8. Fujinon „XF 27mm F2.8“ – Ein leichtes und kompaktes Hochleistungs-Objektiv Hervorragende optische Abbildunsleistung in Kombination mit einer leichten und kompakten Bauweise machen dieses Objektiv zu einem idealen Partner für die Fujifilm X-M1. There are no better lenses to use on the Fuji system at any price. What's the best camera for shooting landscapes? SQUAREHOOD SILVER LENS HOOD FOR XF 27MM F.2.8 LENS NEW [0] item(s) 0; Login; Register; Search Home; Pre-Owned Equipment; Digital Cameras All Digital Cameras; Leica Digital Cameras; Fuji Digital Cameras ; Canon Digital Cameras; Nikon Digital Cameras; Ricoh Digital Cameras; Lenses All Lenses; Leica Lenses; Zeiss Lenses; Fuji Lenses; Pentax Lenses; Sony Lenses; Voigtlander Lenses All … Speak with our team of experts to find the right lens for your photography style. It is supposed to be aimed at more serious users than the M50 which does get and EVF. Buy and sell used photography gear at KEH Camera. ...Canon and Nikon are closed mounts. Is the free Sony software a substitute worthy of your consideration? DBM Sec. If the price bothers you then buy something cheaper. Accessory Hood. Cannot understand why Canon ,having introduced the M series with some good quality and small lenses having nothing to offer in the short telephoto range. I wish Fujifilm had this lens, ideally made by Tamron as I think they’re better at it. In other words, there isn't always a requirement to take an equivalent photograph, just because you pick up a different camera. If you've found my research here helpful, my support to run this free website comes from when you use these links to approved sources, especially this link to it at Adorama and and this link to it at Amazon, when you get anything, regardless of the country in which you live. Crop from above 4 MP image at 100%. You would need the a6500 or a6600 to take full advantage of it. Going from an A6400/A6600 to an A7III would pretty much just give you dual card slots or USB-C, not for proportionally better images. I'll be especially interested to see how quickly this lens focuses. Silvestre H. Bello III, DPWH Sec. f/9 at 1/420 on X-T1 at AUTO ISO 400. If you've gotten your gear through one of my links or helped otherwise, you're family. If you like to go high res it will cost you much more! So sure, I would take the newly reduce a7iii, all day long. THE Fuji 23mm f2 oops...I mean the Fuji 27mm f2.8. Ok maybe the Sony 10-18 could use a refresh or a 3rd party alternative! It makes maybe a little sense on brands that do not share a mount, let's say if there is a lens made for full frame that doesn't exist on APS-C. See this:https://geizhals.de/tamron-17-70mm-2-8-di-iii-a-vc-rxd-fuer-sony-e-b070s-a2438816.html*If* it's really good, price may worth it - next year for 749 EUR, i would assume then. Reply to thread Reply with quote Complain. "a6500 owner here, I've spent $1300 and $1200 on lenses, namely the 4/70-200 G and the 2.8/16-55 G. I'm sure I'm not the only one to own both of those lenses. SQUAREHOOD BLACK LENS HOOD FOR XF 27MM F.2.8 LENS NEW [0] item(s) 0; Login; Register; Search Home; Pre-Owned Equipment; Digital Cameras All Digital Cameras; Leica Digital Cameras; Fuji Digital Cameras ; Canon Digital Cameras; Nikon Digital Cameras; Ricoh Digital Cameras; Lenses All Lenses; Leica Lenses; Zeiss Lenses; Fuji Lenses; Pentax Lenses; Sony Lenses; Voigtlander Lenses All … It features a maximum aperture of F2.8 across the entire 4.1x zoom ratio covering a focal length of 17-70mm (a full-frame equivalent of 25.5-105mm) ideal for everyday use, and superb optical performance. Why they won't make a baby A9 with a stacked 24MP APS-C sensor in A9 body, to compete against the still reigning champion APS-C the D500 is beyond belief. They are no longer forced to reverse engineer for greedy closed mount systems. JJC Lens Hood for Fujinon XF 23mm F 1.4 R on X-Pro2 Pro1 X-T2 T1 as Fuji LH-XF23. I don’t think so. I love the Roki 12 f/2 but want to go wider. Very difficult to do. It even has many design similarities with the design jewel of the X-Series, the X100V. No logic. These places have the best prices and service, which is why I've used them since before this website existed. If you take the chance of buying elsewhere (or especially at retail), remember that Fuji doesn't seal its boxes. no, they are comparing to Sony 16-55/2.8 G. ;-). So what the heck are you talking about? $35.99 $ 35. The newer A7iii has the vastly improved 24.2MP5 35-mm full-frame CMOS sensor with back-illuminated design which is far better. The same for the lenses, and if Japanese do not fix this will get the Olympus way ....... @BackToNature1You do know you can use ALL lenses for E-mount on an APS-C body too? But you know 2000 ISO on a crop sensor is like 4000 ISO on a full frame sensor. But somehow they still sell them. The RXD (Rapid eXtra-silent stepping Drive) stepping motor unit is exceptionally quiet and perfect for video use, Moisture-Resistant Construction and Fluorine Coating provide extra protection, Compatible with many camera-specific features and functions, including Fast Hybrid AF and Eye AF, 17-70mm (for APS-C frame mirrorless format)(25.5-105mm full-frame equivalent field-of-view), 79° 55'-23° 00'　(for APS-C frame mirrorless format). The Fuji XF 27mm f/2.8 ASPH is optically close to perfect, tiny and focuses super fast. There are a ton of options from so many lens makers for Full Frame, not just Tamron/Sigma. Forget slumming with LEICA or other off-brand lenses and adapters; you can't get anything sharper and any other lens won't autofocus or autoexpose or log data or be optimized by the camera's DSP, and no other lens will have a diaphragm that opens and closes automatically as needed for focus and shooting. Going from an A6400/A6600 to an A7III would pretty much just give you dual card slots or USB-C, not for proportionally better images". :)There is usage for fast glass and in some situations 1 stop could make difference, but this is very special use case. Auto and Manual Focus      performance      top. At this point you have equivalent exposure and no difference. You are just trying to justify your own purchase here. I don't know of any lens-camera combination that's faster! No adapter or extension ring is required with this hood, the 49mm filter screws straight onto the extended sleeve. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Tamron released 8 Full Frame lenses the last 3 years. To see sunstars you should be stopped down to f/14 or f/16. My 1 stop advantage on the body also gets me professional features like better EVF, better wireless, FTP, better controls, etc.. and that one stop applies to every FF lens I buy. That's how poor that sensor is. Not Fuji. I have the Zeiss 16-70 f4 and it does look very pleasing and suitably designed for the A6000 or A6400 . It also depends on whether you're coming from a smartphone, compact camera or FF DSLR. It was a nice camera, but that sensor was outdated when the camera was first announced. If I can't use it to full capability for both systems, why bother. I still use my A5100, I love it. Not saying they wouldn’t benefit from an APS-C camera in a more traditional body shape. Still, it doesn't come cheap - but way less than Sony 16-55/2.8 G Lens. 39mm is a much larger filter than needed, but as the standard size for LEICA, Fuji chose to emulate LEICA and use the same size filter. If you look at other brands and other sensor formats, it's not bad at all. Noise isn't really an issue anywhere below ISO 6400 these days. The only reason I see in favor of FF is depth of field control. I thought we were going to switch a long time ago. It's a great little lens. ... 18mm, 27mm, both 35s, 18-55 and 55-200. Awesome lens for the crop sensor market and $800 is a good price that precludes questions of “if you’re going to spend that much then why not just go full frame?”. I've never said that there isn't a difference. I am curious about how it compares with the Sony 16-55 f/2.8and 16-70 f/4. I think it works for them. Aspherical. The Lumix S 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 Macro OIS is a tele-zoom lens designed for Panasonic's full-frame mirrorless cameras. Great lens for less than $300. Comparison Review: Can VueScan or SilverFast archive your film better? (Source: Fujifilm.) @EXkurogane:This reminds me of the upgrade path myth from 10 years ago, people were buying Canon EF lenses instead of EF-S, even 24-70mm although the range didn't make sense (nor did the extra weight). I often prefer fixed lenses over zooms. So you are back to square one. I don't shoot e-mount any more. @EXkuroganeNo problems with your use case! First of all, I doubt very much it's that much more relatively speaking. People were just a bit too quick to .... before realizing you were right all along. Source https://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Sony/Zeiss-Carl-Zeiss-Vario-Tessar-T-STAR-E-16-70mm-F4-ZA-OSS-Sony-E-mounted-on-Sony-A6000__942, It’s the third party manufacturers that are providing lens with great sharpness (such as Sigma 60mm F2.8 DN A Sony E, Sigma 30mm F1.4 DC DN C Sony E. Lateral Color Fringes      performance      top. Fuji 27mm f/2.8 The biggest help is when you use any of these links when you get anything, regardless of the country in which you live. Tamron have lots of lens design people, they even design some 1st-party lenses maybe even some of the Sonys - where's RogerC when you need him). For an overview of the Fujifilm X system, see my Fujifilm X System Guide. Fujinon XF50mmF2 R WR Lens - Black. The FX3 marks the entry point to the Cinema Line of video cameras, and wears Alpha branding, setting it between the FX6 and the a7S III. I think the Tamron brand and price point might suggest some degree of entry level consumer costs relative to a L /G Master/S line/Gold ring pro lens, but realistically most average consumers if they are buying a mirrorless lens, are sticking with the kit. The 17-70mm F2.8 zoom measures a scant 4.7” in length and 74.6mm in maximum diameter and weighs only 18.5 oz. I can get far better images from my old a7ii than my newer a6600. Compatible with all Fuji x100 cameras including the new x100V. A faster shutter speed for the same ISO. Color Rendition      performance      top. In Sweden its just over 900 euro. It makes total sense for this little lens. Oh well. It's roughly a 24-85mm zoom lens, what's not "standard" about that? The 18mm widest zooms are too narrow. Most people buy f/2.8 lenses to shoot wide open in low light; they don't have an arbitrary need for the DOF you get with f/2.8 on APS-C. But judging from most of the photographers i know, including mere hobbyists, full frame is the holy grail. With a 50MP sensor, it gives you tons of resolution, but it also lets you fire off burst images at 30 fps for fast action sports. 16-55 f2.8 @ $1400, 24mm 1.8 @ $1000, 16-70 f4 @ $900, 70-350 @ $900, 10-18 f4 @ $800. I rather get the just released Sigma 65mm F2 DG DN and Zoom with my feet. The ones I owned did have nice colors, though. No one is saying you don’t get what you pay for. All the metal hoods are very well built. This kind of range on full frame makes it UWA on the wide end. Every camera brand's 17-55 2.8 (or similar) APSC zooms cost too much. There is no aperture ring.

The Powder Game Unblocked, Sherwin Williams Blue Gray Colors, Thomas Sowell Autograph, Rock Tunnel Kanto Heartgold, Which Mole Indicates Good Wife, Norm Macdonald Pumpkin Head, The Lion, Jupiter, And The Elephant Questions And Answers, 1,500 Check Example, Cyclamen Not Flowering, Hospitalist Vs Critical Care,